The problem with this is that you started testing glxgears because, for instance, GoogleEarth started to crown when in the previous Linux version it flyed (my case, good GE performance with Xandros on my eee and unsuable GE on ubuntu 8.10).
You end up with some idea of the performance loss when they say that Ubuntu 7.04 could make glxgears achieve 1500FPS and now it done only 50FPS. The question now is, how are we going to know if the performance of later versions is enhanced or not if we don't measure it with the same tools? Does anyone have numbers FPS on Tremulous or some other 3D intensive app as far as Ubuntu 7.04 so we can compare with 9.04 (without the vblank sync thing that makes numbers up)? (The vblank sync that reduces Jaunty FPS might be a clever thing for normal use and energy-wise, but is it not very useful when comparing different driver versions for performance) Jose 2009/1/28 Hans <hfair...@ata-sd.com> > I believe that in the past, Bryce has stated that 3D applications that > report frame-rates will do. Such as Tux Racer. In order for this to be > useful though, you have to be careful to capture your system > configuration: XXorg.0.log, glxinfo, xdpyinfo,, etc. > > Phoronix also has a test suite that does similar things. > > Hans > > -- > MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252094 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > -- MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252094 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
