How is the integrated Google Search service any different from the integrated anti-phishing service? Both come with additional terms. Yet Google Search is not debated here, while the anti-phishing services are.
Maybe if you could configure from which provider you would like to get the anti-phishing information, it would be OK. That's the case with the search bar too. There is nothing standing in the way of adding a search engine that is a "free service". This is not yet possible with the anti- phishing service. The problem is that there are no free alternatives. And I'm not convinced that the current solution is non-free. Also, I don't think Canonical or Shuttleworth can just come up -on the spot- with a good definition of a free service and with a policy on them. That needs a lot of debate. -- AN IRRELEVANT LICENSE IS PRESENTED TO YOU FREE-OF-CHARGE ON STARTUP https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269656 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
