On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 12:13 +0000, Creak wrote: > Sorry to add another comment to this already too long list... I'd just say > two things. > - If I went to Ubuntu (after have been on Debian for some years), it's > because it > seems to respect the Free (as in Freedom) philosophy. This kind of agreement > between > Mozilla and Ubuntu is clearly against this philosophy. > - If Ubuntu accepts this from Mozilla, what prevents other projects to do the > same. > I clearly don't want to have to agree 50 EULAs before using my OS. > > And why Apache, Gimp, Gnome, KDE and others don't need EULAs?
And also Xen, which has a very strict trademark policy.. Citrix does not require such nonsense,why should Mozilla? Sorry folks, I'm done promoting Ubuntu. The lack of response from Ubuntu tells all, barring a few emails from Mark asking us to STFU. Redhat negotiated the first patent deal that is agreeable with GPL3, what has Ubuntu done other than tweak the work of others (i.e Debian) ? Good luck Mark.. Cheers, --Tim -- AN IRRELEVANT LICENSE IS PRESENTED TO YOU FREE-OF-CHARGE ON STARTUP https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269656 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
