2008/9/15 Andrew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > using Firefox[3]. So I suspect that Google wishing to protect themselves > from allegations of spying on Firefox users have insisted on the privacy > policy being prominent and, agreed by Firefox users. However, no one who > knows about it can talk about it, because of non disclosures agreements. > I am not suggesting that there is anything sinister going on, just > cautious lawyers keeping everyone quiet.
Which was why I proposed to change the EULA to a dialog that says something like: "Do you wish to enable phishing protection? This will require sending communication to google but no private information will be sent unless you tag a suspected site." [Enable] [Disable phishing protection] That way it's not a EULA, the user is informed, and users who don't want to can disable phishing protection and still use firefox. -- AN IRRELEVANT LICENSE IS PRESENTED TO YOU FREE-OF-CHARGE ON STARTUP https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269656 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
