Sorry, I thought it was a reply based on the multiple quotes taken from the original message, including the contextual relevance of the entire email in general. Let's focus on my top-posting though, it eats the relevance of anything I say based purely on user preference, and that's a real priority for us here, I think.
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 8:33 PM, Dave Hall <dave.h...@skwashd.com> wrote: > On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 20:20 +1000, Tony "H.G" Candito wrote: > > Why is this a separate email? Why didn't you just hit reply under the > > relevant message? > > It wasn't a reply to any particular message in that thread it was a > general comment on the discussion. > > A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? > A: Top-posting. > Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? > > Cheers > > Dave > >
-- ubuntu-au mailing list ubuntu-au@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-au
