To retain the current structure to me means that Ubuntu-AU keeps on floundering in the doldrums in Australia.
There is no progress in any direction, no structure and no leadership. There is a 'Main Team Contact' who has been unresponsive. Who can one contact other than a known fellow Ubuntu user or the ubuntu-au list in general? >From time to time I read on the mailing list of someone offering an idea on how to promote Ubuntu. Their boundless energy is very much apparent. What happens to this talent when there is no contactable figure or two to help channel it. With a structured Ubuntu-AU there would be someone to respond, to nourish and to foster. Many Ubuntu users have no contact whatsoever with the ubuntu-au list nor are they 'registered' on the Ubuntu-AU web page. The response to any encouragement to join the list or declare their presence is met with: Why? and What for? I have no answer for them because there is none that makes any sense. After answering questions for several years on the Ubuntu Forum and on Launchpad I feel that I have expiated my obligation for the freedom that the Ubuntu operating system has granted to me. Yet, I have still more to offer. The question is to whom shall I make this offer. I would vote for 'Structure' and a group of 'Elders' ( for those that dislike authoritative titles ). Andre On 13 April 2010 13:00, AndrewG <gande...@gmail.com> wrote: > Time for a new Thread. > > It seams to me that there are two camps in this debate. > > 1. Status-Quo: Keeping the 'Structure' that we currently have. > 2. An "ACC": Adding to the current 'Structure', provisioning for a > 'Group of Leaders' that is made up from "Local" communities around > Australia. > > > Do we have any other suggestions ? > > Cheers, > > Andrew G. > > -- > ubuntu-au mailing list > ubuntu-au@lists.ubuntu.com > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-au >
-- ubuntu-au mailing list ubuntu-au@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-au
