On Sat, 2011-02-19 at 00:36 -0600, Leandro Gómez wrote: > On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 11:50 PM, Vishnoo <v...@ubuntu.com> wrote: > > On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 19:30 -0500, coz DS wrote: > > > > We all need to do our part in trying to talk with jbaer, > other > > than those that already have, to help him understand that > his behavior > > is not team oriented and a destructive path which only leads > to people > > leaving the group. > > > > I personally want to know why this decision... why these > > misleading links ,, What the hell was he thinking! > > > > Events like this, which compound the existing issues > the group > > has,, only pushes away any possibility of real recognition > of the > > community art team by canonical! > > > > coz > > > > I'm +1 on this, exactly why us banning him is not going to > help. > > John needs to explain his actions and course-correct his > attitude. > He needs to correct his behavior, or if he is not able to > correct > himself he needs to quit on his own. > > Someone else banning him wont help here, and might blow this > 'silly > drama' out of proportion > > > > To me, this whole situation has already been blown out of proportion. > > > Really... it's a no brainer. If someone is threatening the team, what > do you do? Wait and see if the problem resolves itself or take action? > > > Banning a person is the last resource. If you have tried to resolve > the issue privately and failed, why don't you take it publicly? We can > have a meeting on IRC with John and the rest of the team and see if we > can agree on how to move forward. What do you think? > > > Cheers, >
Sure, a meeting to resolve this sounds good. Someone kindly take the initiative and set a date&time when John can attend. -- Cheers, Vish -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
