On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 19:55 +0300, Сергей wrote: > On the other hand, a separate group for artwork makes much more sense > than mixing it with photography. Participators can look for > inspiration and judges won't have to separate artwork from photos.
Yep, thats why submissions were in a separate place earlier, but the site had technical issues while submitting. So instead of making it confusing about which group to submit within the same site, Iain just had one group and he has a process already in place how to ensure that the judging takes into account these 3 wallpapers. Now we have people submitting illustrations in 2 groups, the official group and some misled people submitting in his personal-group. Complicating everything for folks just interested in contributing their artwork! I find it hard to believe that he has done this unintentionally. Even if he was not sure where the illustrations were supposed to be submitted, how difficult is it for one to just ask the persons concerned for some clarification? Random people submitting artwork commented on the blog that submitting was broken on the art-owl site and quickly the site was changed to flickr. How difficult is it for someone to just ask for clarification? After he blogged about his group recently, I noticed that he has commented in several places propagating his group even *before* the switch to flickr was done. See his comment here: <http://www.flickr.com/groups/ubuntu-artwork/discuss/72157625738501389/> His comment was prior to Iain's comment about the update to submissions. -- Cheers, Vish -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
