Hi Tom, (seems like gmail does not honor the rule that replies should drop the "(was: xxxxx)" part in an e-mail subject; but hey, neither does Claws apparently. Sigh.)
On Sat, 13 Oct 2012 08:17:41 -0700, Tom Rini <tr...@ti.com> wrote: > On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 3:11 AM, Albert ARIBAUD > <albert.u.b...@aribaud.net> wrote: > > Hi Tom, > > > > On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 16:15:02 -0700, Tom Rini <tr...@ti.com> wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 12:27:09AM +0200, stefano babic wrote: > >> > >> [snip] > >> > One reason to move into the board directory is that there was a decision > >> > to move rules related to only one arch or SOC where they belong to, that > >> > is in the corresponding arch/ or board/ directory. > >> > >> I'll admit that maybe my make-fu is off, but that idea doesn't work, at > >> least for SPL. So I'd really like someone to make that work first. > > > > Tom, can you be more specific than 'it doesn't work'? :) > > > > Seriously, though, I'm interested in understand what the make issue is > > there, because I am indeed a proponent of putting files where they > > belong to, so if help is needed there, I would try to. > > I have had no luck moving things like the 'MLO' rule from spl/Makefile > to anywhere else. Same with the 'checkthumb' rule in the top-level > Makefile. Ok, now it is more precise :) but still not enough for me to efficiently try and analyze the issue. Let's take the checkthumb rule. Where did you try to move it? Amicalement, -- Albert. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
