Hi On Wednesday 10 October 2012 12:14:00 Stephen Warren wrote: > From: Stephen Warren <swar...@nvidia.com> > > This removes the standalone cur_part_nr variable, opening the way to > replacing fat_register_device() with fat_set_blk_dev(). > > Note that when get_partition_info() fails and we use the entire disk, > the correct partition number is 0 (whole disk) not 1 (first partition), > so that change is also made here. > > An alternative to this (and the previous) patch might be to simply > remove the partition number from the printf(). I don't know how attached > people are to it. > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swar...@nvidia.com>
Just as a heads up, in the DM any difference between a partition and a whole block device (also between different interfaces for disks) is hidden from any user code (code other than the one keeping track of partitions/disks, that only uses such information to determine whether to scan for partitions), you only get some object that can read/write blocks if you ask it nicely, and you have to make do with that (if you need more then you're probably doing something wrong). As a result, there is no notion of partition number, and the string you are patching up here (along with many others, due to unification of disk interfaces) is changed. Best Regards Pavel Herrmann _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
