> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Walle [mailto:mich...@walle.cc]
> Sent: 04 October 2012 16:45
> To: Prafulla Wadaskar
> Cc: Michael Walle; u-boot@lists.denx.de; Joe Hershberger; Wolfgang
> Denk
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] lsxl: set ncip to broadcast address
> 
> On Thu, October 4, 2012 12:47, Prafulla Wadaskar wrote:
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Michael Walle [mailto:mich...@walle.cc]
> >> Sent: 03 October 2012 21:15
> >> To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> >> Cc: Michael Walle; Prafulla Wadaskar
> >> Subject: [PATCH] lsxl: set ncip to broadcast address
> >>
> >> Instead of using the serverip we get from the DHCP server, use the
> >> broadcast address. That way it isn't necessary to use a special
> DHCP
> >> configuration to set the netconsole peer.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <mich...@walle.cc>
> >> Cc: Prafulla Wadaskar <prafu...@marvell.com>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> Hi Prafulla,
> >>
> >> although it isn't a bugfix, it would be nice, if this patch made it
> >> into
> >> the 2012.10 release.
> >>
> >>  include/configs/lsxl.h |    2 +-
> >>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/include/configs/lsxl.h b/include/configs/lsxl.h
> >> index 0db559c..663c5e2 100644
> >> --- a/include/configs/lsxl.h
> >> +++ b/include/configs/lsxl.h
> >> @@ -146,7 +146,7 @@
> >>    "config_nc_dhcp=setenv autoload_old ${autoload}; "              \
> >>            "setenv autoload no "                                   \
> >>            "&& bootp "                                             \
> >> -          "&& setenv ncip ${serverip} "                           \
> >> +          "&& setenv ncip 255.255.255.255 "                       \
> >
> > Michael
> > Hard coding an ip-address is not recommended in u-boot environment.
> > I would need ack from Joe and Wolfgang to pull this patch.
> 
> Hi Prafulla,
> 
> i wouldn't call 255.255.255.255 an IP address ;) i could actually
> unset
> ncip. In that case the netconsole driver itself implicitly assumes the
> 255.255.255.255 broadcast address. I found my solution more
> transparent,
> because you see the used target IP address at first sight.
> 
> But if you see the broadcast address as an hardcoded IP address, i'll
> prepare another version of the patch with "setenv ncip" (unset) this
> evening.

I think that would be good :-)

Regards...
Prafulla . . .
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to