Dear Tom Rini, > On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 06:53:19PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > > Dear Joe Hershberger, > > > > [...] > > > > > While you're touching all these files, why not replace the > > > __u_boot_cmd* implementation with this as well. There's no need to > > > leave a special case in there as well is there? > > > > Not in the first stab, it can be indeed done later, but now I'd like to > > avoid breakage. Besides, replacing u_boot_cmd would break bisectability, > > I want to preserve it and rather apply more patches slowly than less > > patches recklessly. > > Agreed. We need to work hard to make sure we do lots of incremental > steps here to make sure breakage can be bisected.
+1 (actually +inf.) > Making use of the > 'exec' step in git rebase is very helpful for making sure this is the > case too, btw. exec step ? Best regards, Marek Vasut _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
