Dear Joe Hershberger,
[...]
> While you're touching all these files, why not replace the
> __u_boot_cmd* implementation with this as well. There's no need to
> leave a special case in there as well is there?
Not in the first stab, it can be indeed done later, but now I'd like to avoid
breakage. Besides, replacing u_boot_cmd would break bisectability, I want to
preserve it and rather apply more patches slowly than less patches recklessly.
> > . = ALIGN(4);
> >
> > + .u_boot_list : {
> > + INCLUDE u-boot.lst;
> > + }
> > +
> > + . = ALIGN(4);
> >
> > __bss_start = .;
> > .bss : { *(.bss) }
> > __bss_end__ = .;
>
> -Joe
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
