Hi, Andreas

Thank you for the quick reply.

On 8/15/2012 3:50 PM, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
Dear Josh Wu,

On 15.08.2012 08:50, Josh Wu wrote:
Hi, Andreas

Sorry, in these patches of current version, it still has a bug, which
will fail to write with PMECC, I will send out the v2 patch soon which
include this bug fix.
Oups, sorry I had this patch series not on my list. Will review this or
v2 these days.
On first sight the first two in series are ok, the third one has style
problems:

---8<---
abiessmann@azuregos % ./tools/checkpatch.pl
U-Boot-3-3-at91-atmel_nand-Update-driver-to-support-Programmable-Multibit-ECC-controller.patch
WARNING: line over 80 characters
...
total: 1 errors, 27 warnings, 787 lines checked

NOTE: Ignored message types: COMPLEX_MACRO CONSIDER_KSTRTO MINMAX
MULTISTATEMENT_MACRO_USE_DO_WHILE

U-Boot-3-3-at91-atmel_nand-Update-driver-to-support-Programmable-Multibit-ECC-controller.patch
has style problems, please review.

If any of these errors are false positives, please report
them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.
--->8---

I personally do not really care about the 80 char warning but please
remove these for the sake of peace ;) and please have a look for the
reported error.

sure, I will fix that. :)

And the last, you should add at least one user of this feature. Isn't
the lately applied at91sam9x5ek (is in u-boot-atmel/master and
u-boot-arm/master) a perfect user for that?

you are right, The PMECC usage is for 9x5ek board.
I planed to push the PMECC support patches in 9x5 board in two part:
one is this series, which only include nand flash driver changes. I thought those patches should be merged by u-boot mtd maintainer. Another part is some patches for 9x5 board file and config file which enable PMECC in 9x5ek board. Those patches are not sent out yet.

Now I think if you can merge all above patches to u-boot mainline, then maybe I can sent those patches together. What do you think about this?


On 8/9/2012 6:21 PM, Josh Wu wrote:
This patch series will add PMECC support for atmel nand driver in u-boot.

The driver patch is ported from kernel patch. The main different from
kernel patch is
the modification about registers access part. in this version it via a
register structure to access.
A question regarding linux driver. You say it is derived from the kernel
driver, but I can not see PMECC stuff in kernel:

Sorry, I am not make it clear about this. Actually, The PMECC stuff is not in v3.6-rc1 now, it is queued in kernel MTD maintainer's git tree: http://git.infradead.org/linux-mtd.git/commit/1c7b874d33b463f7150b1ab4617f000af9b327fd Seems the maintainer missed the merge window of v3.6-rc1. I am not sure that can go into v3.6 or not. But I think it is not a bad idea to push those code into u-boot. :)

---8<---
abiessmann@azuregos % git describe
v3.6-rc1-355-gddf343f
abiessmann@azuregos % diff -Nrupa drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
../u-boot/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c | diffstat
  atmel_nand.c | 1231
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
  1 file changed, 720 insertions(+), 511 deletions(-)
abiessmann@azuregos % grep -in pmecc drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand*
abiessmann@azuregos %
--->8---

Which driver/patch do you mean?

It is tested in atmel 9x5 series board.
Unfortunately I can not test this driver cause I do only have older
sam926x devices around.

If I send 9x5 board enable patches with nand PMECC patches together, I think maybe other people can test it in 9x5ed board.


Best regards

Andreas Bießmann

Best Regards,
Josh Wu
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to