On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 8:06 PM, Scott Wood <scottw...@freescale.com> wrote: > LAW init is skipped in the SPL payload because it's assumed that the SPL > has taken care of it -- so make sure the SPL loads all the LAWs as is > done on other boards.
It might be good to try this on a few different compilers to see if they are all under the size requirement. I've made this smaller from other work so it could still be OK. -M > > This bug was introduced by: > > commit 4589728e214958a4e6e011a081a68d360c49d7a5 > Author: Kumar Gala <ga...@kernel.crashing.org> > Date: Fri Nov 11 08:14:53 2011 -0600 > > powerpc/85xx: Fix builds of P1020/P2020RDB-PC_36BIT_NAND > > Size grew a bit so nand-spl didn't fit in 4k, reduce done by removing > LAW entries not needed during SPL phase. > > Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottw...@freescale.com> > --- > board/freescale/p1_p2_rdb_pc/law.c | 2 -- > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/board/freescale/p1_p2_rdb_pc/law.c > b/board/freescale/p1_p2_rdb_pc/law.c > index 7968919..0da8300 100644 > --- a/board/freescale/p1_p2_rdb_pc/law.c > +++ b/board/freescale/p1_p2_rdb_pc/law.c > @@ -25,13 +25,11 @@ > #include <asm/mmu.h> > > struct law_entry law_table[] = { > -#ifndef CONFIG_NAND_SPL > SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_CPLD_BASE_PHYS, LAW_SIZE_1M, LAW_TRGT_IF_LBC), > SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_PMC_BASE_PHYS, LAW_SIZE_64K, LAW_TRGT_IF_LBC), > #ifdef CONFIG_VSC7385_ENET > SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_VSC7385_BASE_PHYS, LAW_SIZE_1M, LAW_TRGT_IF_LBC), > #endif > -#endif > SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_FLASH_BASE_PHYS, LAW_SIZE_64M, LAW_TRGT_IF_LBC), > #ifdef CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BASE_PHYS > SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BASE_PHYS, LAW_SIZE_1M, LAW_TRGT_IF_LBC), > -- > 1.7.9.5 > > _______________________________________________ > U-Boot mailing list > U-Boot@lists.denx.de > http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot