On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 8:06 PM, Scott Wood <scottw...@freescale.com> wrote:
> LAW init is skipped in the SPL payload because it's assumed that the SPL
> has taken care of it -- so make sure the SPL loads all the LAWs as is
> done on other boards.
It might be good to try this on a few different compilers to see if
they are all under the size requirement. I've made this smaller from
other work so it could still be OK.
-M
>
> This bug was introduced by:
>
> commit 4589728e214958a4e6e011a081a68d360c49d7a5
> Author: Kumar Gala <ga...@kernel.crashing.org>
> Date: Fri Nov 11 08:14:53 2011 -0600
>
> powerpc/85xx: Fix builds of P1020/P2020RDB-PC_36BIT_NAND
>
> Size grew a bit so nand-spl didn't fit in 4k, reduce done by removing
> LAW entries not needed during SPL phase.
>
> Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottw...@freescale.com>
> ---
> board/freescale/p1_p2_rdb_pc/law.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/board/freescale/p1_p2_rdb_pc/law.c
> b/board/freescale/p1_p2_rdb_pc/law.c
> index 7968919..0da8300 100644
> --- a/board/freescale/p1_p2_rdb_pc/law.c
> +++ b/board/freescale/p1_p2_rdb_pc/law.c
> @@ -25,13 +25,11 @@
> #include <asm/mmu.h>
>
> struct law_entry law_table[] = {
> -#ifndef CONFIG_NAND_SPL
> SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_CPLD_BASE_PHYS, LAW_SIZE_1M, LAW_TRGT_IF_LBC),
> SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_PMC_BASE_PHYS, LAW_SIZE_64K, LAW_TRGT_IF_LBC),
> #ifdef CONFIG_VSC7385_ENET
> SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_VSC7385_BASE_PHYS, LAW_SIZE_1M, LAW_TRGT_IF_LBC),
> #endif
> -#endif
> SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_FLASH_BASE_PHYS, LAW_SIZE_64M, LAW_TRGT_IF_LBC),
> #ifdef CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BASE_PHYS
> SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BASE_PHYS, LAW_SIZE_1M, LAW_TRGT_IF_LBC),
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
> _______________________________________________
> U-Boot mailing list
> U-Boot@lists.denx.de
> http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
