Dear Graeme Russ, > Hi Scott, > > On 07/21/2012 07:40 AM, Scott Wood wrote: > > On 07/20/2012 04:34 PM, Graeme Russ wrote: > >> Hi Kim & Marek, > >> > >> On 07/21/2012 07:09 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: > >>> Dear Kim Phillips, > >>> > >>>> On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 23:30:49 +0200 > >>>> > >>>> Detlev Zundel <d...@denx.de> wrote: > >>>>> as promised, here are my expanded notes from the BoF meeting at > >>>>> LSM2012 last week. It was a pleasure to get some core developers > >>>>> into one room > >>>> > >>>> Any word on Kconfig support? > >>>> > >>>> Kim > >>> > >>> I was digging in it for a bit, but then Graeme took over. > >> > >> I have started on it - I've ported over the Kbuild infrastructure into a > >> dedicated 'kbuild' makefile which is called from the main makefile. This > >> make modifications to the existing makefile very minimal > >> > >> Now it's just a case of building all the Kconfig files which is, to say > >> the least, a massive task. I have a lot of other things going on, so > >> unfortunately progress is slow > > > > How about a transitional phase, where a symbol can either be a kconfig > > symbol or handled the old way via the board config file? That way, > > custodians/maintainers could handle the conversion of their own symbols > > (with the expectation that this be done within a reasonable timeframe). > > Well the plan in to have 'make xyz_config' produce the equivalent .config > file (which it pretty much does anyway) - You can then use Kconfig to tweak > the board config > > Or use Kconfig to create a config from scratch
Maybe you can push your current patchset somewhere so others can hack on it too ? > Regards, > > Graeme Best regards, Marek Vasut _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
