Hi Prafulla, On 07/03/2012 10:05 AM, Prafulla Wadaskar wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Holger Brunck [mailto:holger.bru...@keymile.com] >> Sent: 13 June 2012 19:03 >> To: u-boot@lists.denx.de >> Cc: Holger Brunck; Valentin Longchamp; Prafulla Wadaskar >> Subject: [PATCH v2 03/14] arm/km: convert mgcoge3un target to >> km_kirkwood >> >> Use the generic header km_kirkwood.h and get rid of the >> board specific header. >> >> Signed-off-by: Holger Brunck <holger.bru...@keymile.com> >> Signed-off-by: Valentin Longchamp <valentin.longch...@keymile.com> >> cc: Prafulla Wadaskar <prafu...@marvell.com> >> --- >> changes for v2: >> - rebased because of changes in other patches >> >> board/keymile/km_arm/km_arm.c | 9 ++-- >> boards.cfg | 2 +- >> include/configs/km_kirkwood.h | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++ >> include/configs/mgcoge3un.h | 87 -------------------------------- >> --------- >> 4 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-) >> delete mode 100644 include/configs/mgcoge3un.h > > This patch makes sense to me since it since it shrinks overall code. > Doe not have dependency in patch series, can be accepted if outside the > series. >
again, but there are a lot of dependencies between 01-02 and 03-04 because all doing a lot in km_kirkwood.h. So do you have any particular objections against the first two patches, beside your input for the kwbimage.cfg which I answered in a different mail? Regards Holger _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
