Am Freitag 11 Mai 2012, 23:29:47 schrieb Wolfgang Denk: > Dear Michael Walle, > > In message <201205112320.15462.mich...@walle.cc> you wrote: > > > This is inconsequent. Either we assume that the user will seed > > > srand(), then y should not be initialized at all, so it goes to the > > > BSS segment and does not waste space in the binary image. Or we want > > > to deal with cases where the user doesn call srand(), and then we > > > should provide a bit better than such a static initialization. > > > > Again, i wanted to stick with the regular rand() srand() semantics. > > > > http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/rand.html > > "If rand() is called before any calls to srand() are made, the same > > sequence shall be generated as when srand() is first called with a seed > > value of 1." > > Good point. > > But then y should be initialized as 1 ? I'm no crypto expert, so i sticked with the values/examples from the cited paper. But i guess it shouldn't make any difference, i'll change it to 1.
-- michael _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
