Dear Stefano, Anatolij, Scott, On 18.04.2012 13:47, Stefano Babic wrote: > On 18/04/2012 10:54, Timo Ketola wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Timo Ketola <t...@exertus.fi> ... >> diff --git a/drivers/video/mx2fb.c b/drivers/video/mx2fb.c >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..9ee4a3e > > IMHO it is better if you use the video API instead of the old LCD > interface, that means using CONFIG_VIDEO. You have then to implement a > video_hw_init() function for your initialisation. I think there are > advantages doing that, and recently some drivers moved to this API, for > example the driver for i.MX3 (mx3fb.c).
I agree on that but unfortunately I'm short on time. What if I implement the driver in my board folder instead? I suppose there is not too much interest to get generic LCD support for i.MX2 because it is not yet there and architecture is a little oldish. There should still be register definitions in the imx-regs.h like I propose in this patch. Or should I keep them too in my board folder? Timo Ketola (1): i.MX25: lcdc: Add register definitions arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx25/imx-regs.h | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) -- 1.7.5.4 _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
