Hi Scott,
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Scott Wood <scottw...@freescale.com> wrote:
> On 04/17/2012 01:44 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Scott Wood <scottw...@freescale.com> wrote:
>>> On 04/17/2012 01:33 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>>> Hi Stephen,
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Stephen Warren <swar...@wwwdotorg.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> On 04/13/2012 12:29 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>>>>> +nand-controller@0x70008000 {
>>>>>> + compatible = "nvidia,tegra20-nand";
>>>>>> + wp-gpios = <&gpio 59 0>; /* PH3 */
>>>>>> + nvidia,width = <8>;
>>>>>> + nvidia,timing = <26 100 20 80 20 10 12 10 70>;
>>>>>> + nand@0 {
>>>>>> + compatible = "hynix,hy27uf4g2b", "nand-flash";
>>>>>
>>>>> The TRM says there can be up to 8 chip selects. Don't the NAND device
>>>>> sub-nodes need a reg property to indicate which chip-select they're on?
>>>>
>>>> We don't have driver support for this at present.
>>>
>>> That shouldn't matter. The device tree is about describing the
>>> hardware. Ideally the device tree shouldn't have to change if in the
>>> future you do get driver support for it.
>>>
>>> Also, unit addresses should only be present if reg is present, and they
>>> should match.
>>
>> OK I will leave @0 in there, and add a reg property to the node.
>
> Also set #address-cells = <1> and #size-cells = <0> in the controller node.
Thanks, yes spotted that - dtc crashes if you have address cells as zero.
Will send a new series out in a minute.
>
> -Scott
>
Regards,
Simon
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
