Allen Martin <amar...@nvidia.com> writes: >> > only option I found that worked was to use an armv4 toolchain for >> > the armv4 bits and armv7 toolchain for the armv7 bits. >> I'm not an expert in this area, but this cannot be the right >> approach. Did you try asking on the binutils mailing list? This is >> where experts should be available... > > I drilled down on this some more and I found that with an armv4t > linker I can force it to generate armv7 compatible interworking code > if I use the "--use-bx" switch. Unfortunately there doesn't seem to > be any inverse, so with a armv7 linker I can't force it to generate > armv4t compatible interworking. This does seem to be a linker > limitation, I'll take it up on the linaro toolchain list.
You should compile with the -mthumb-interwork gcc flag if you need old-style interworking veneers. The --use-blx flag only affects PLT calls from Thumb code. I doubt you have a PLT in your SPL. -- Måns Rullgård m...@mansr.com _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
