On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 02:12:51PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:01:50PM +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > Dear Tom Rini, > > > > In message > > <CA+M6bXkBodKLkkqFseqo=benul62w-musgsteygv4wlevf1...@mail.gmail.com> you > > wrote: > > > > > > > I don't consider it a big problem (just a bit sad) if ELDK 4.2 cannot > > > > be used for building these. However, I think it is not acceptable > > > > tobuild known-to-be-broken images. If the tool chain is too old, this > > > > shall result in a clear error message and abort of the build. > > > > > > Is an #error in a common omap4/5 file sufficient or does it need to be > > > sooner than that? > > > > If it can be tested there, it can probably also tested before we start > > building at all? > > I suspect no just because the kernel does this in > <linux/compiler-gcc[45].h>
I take it back, we can do that if we bring in the archprepare rule logic that the kernel has. I'll go down this path now... -- Tom _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
