Dear Chander Kashyap,
On 14 March 2012 22:38, Chander Kashyap <chander.kash...@linaro.org> wrote:
> Hi Kyungmin Park,
>
> On 14 March 2012 19:02, Kyungmin Park <kmp...@infradead.org> wrote:
>> Hi Chander,
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:14 PM, Chander Kashyap
>> <chander.kash...@linaro.org> wrote:
>>> TZPC IP is common across S5P and Exynos based SoC'c. Renaming exynos5_tzpc
>>> in arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/tzpc.h to s5p_tzpc will allow generic
>>> usase of tzpc.
>>>
>>> Also modify board/samsung/smdk5250/tzpc_init.c to use s5p_tzpc.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap <chander.kash...@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/tzpc.h | 2 +-
>>> board/samsung/smdk5250/tzpc_init.c | 2 +-
>>> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/tzpc.h
>>> b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/tzpc.h
>>> index 2c9a07b..63736ae 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/tzpc.h
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/tzpc.h
>>> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
>>> #define __TZPC_H_
>>>
>>> #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>>> -struct exynos5_tzpc {
>>> +struct s5p_tzpc {
>> I think 'exynos' is preferable. Even though each SOC has different
> I tried to carry forward old conventions as in case of watchdog. I
> will change it to exynos.
I agreed with Kyungmin.
>From now, let's called "exynos" for common name including s5pc1xx and
s5pc2xx and exynos4 and exynos5.. etc.
>
>> number of tzpc. It can be covered one exynos_tzpc. or we can define
>> it for each SoC.
> One structure is enough as fields are same.
>
Thanks
Minkyu Kang.
--
from. prom.
www.promsoft.net
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
