On 2/6/2012 1:57 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 06 February 2012 15:17:32 Troy Kisky wrote:
On 2/6/2012 12:07 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 06 February 2012 13:48:13 Troy Kisky wrote:
On 2/4/2012 8:38 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 04 February 2012 22:02:46 Troy Kisky wrote:
--- a/drivers/net/phy/broadcom.c
+++ b/drivers/net/phy/broadcom.c
-static struct phy_driver BCM5461S_driver = {
+struct phy_driver BCM5461S_driver __phy_entry = {
why do you have to remove the static ? that shouldn't affect the
section name that it gets placed into.
I had static to start. But the compiler ate all of the code. No
references to any of the static symbols.
sounds like you should change the __phy_entry define from "unused" to
"used"
The would give me compiler warnings for unused variables. How does that
help?
does gcc issue warnings ? doesn't seem to do so for me.
Is there a keep attribute like the linker has for sections?
yes, __attribute__((used))
-mike
Thanks, since the gcc manual I was using didn't list used, I thought you
merely meant to
remove unused.
Seems the gcc version 4.1.2 does not list this option while 4.2.4 does.
What level of compiler is required ?
Troy
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
