> On Wed Jan 11, 2012 at 04:01:31PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: > > > More so, given the fact that we don't have any control over > > > rbl -- so if rbl changes it's layout for any subsequent board, we'd > > > have to add that as well to the nand driver, and both in u-boot as > > > well as the kernel. > > > > > > I guess the cleanest solution would have been for the rbl to have > > > used the same layout as the one used by u-boot and linux. > > > > Yep, why not do that then? > > Because rbl is a proprietary bootloader from TI.
Don't we actually have replacement bootloader in uboot already ? You don't need xloader with uboot anymore I think. > > > > Btw, can you please review this change, that this patch > > > fixes. ACK/NAK? > > > > I'll think about it. It's ok, but it piles one workaround on top of > > another one, I don't like that approach. > > Flushing the data cache before disabling it is not a workaround, > it's a fix. The current code is invalidating the cache instead of > flushing it. Ok, but I'd like to see proper solution eventually. > > -sughosh _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
