On Mon Jan 09, 2012 at 04:30:56PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > On 01/09/2012 11:28 AM, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
<snip> > > --- a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/Makefile > > +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/Makefile > > @@ -38,8 +38,11 @@ COBJS-$(CONFIG_DRIVER_TI_EMAC) += lxt972.o dp83848.o > > et1011c.o ksz8873.o > > > > ifdef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD > > COBJS-y += spl.o > > -COBJS-$(CONFIG_SOC_DM365) += dm365_lowlevel.o > > -COBJS-$(CONFIG_SOC_DA8XX) += da850_lowlevel.o > > +COBJS-$(CONFIG_DM365_SPL) += dm365_lowlevel.o > > +COBJS-$(CONFIG_DM365_SPL) += dm365_spl.o > > +COBJS-$(CONFIG_DA850EVM_SPL) += da850_lowlevel.o > > +COBJS-$(CONFIG_DA850EVM_SPL) += da850_spl.o > > +COBJS-$(CONFIG_HAWKBOARD_SPL) += hawkboard_nand_spl.o > > endif > > CONFIG_SPL_BUILD means we'll only do this on the SPL build, not the > normal build, and we already have symbols for the board and the SoC so > we shouldn't need any new CONFIG symbols here, I'm pretty sure. The problem here is that both da850evm and hawkboard define the CONFIG_SOC_DA850, and CONFIG_SOC_DA8XX, as the hawkboard shares code like pinmux with the da850. I see a CONFIG_MACH_DAVINCI_* like define in da850evm.h and hawkboard.h. Should i add a similar define for cam_enc_4xx, and use these instead. -sughosh _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
