On Saturday 10 December 2011 16:08:03 Simon Glass wrote:
> --- a/lib/time.c
> +++ b/lib/time.c
>
> +ulong __timer_get_boot_us(void)
> +{
> + static ulong base_time;
> +
> + /*
> + * We can't implement this properly. Return 0 on the first call and
> + * larger values after that.
> + */
> + if (base_time)
> + return get_timer(base_time) * 1000;
> + base_time = get_timer(0);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +ulong timer_get_boot_us(void)
> + __attribute__((weak, alias("__timer_get_boot_us")));isn't this duplicating existing post_time_ms() ? -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
