Dear Chander Kashyap, On 22 December 2011 19:52, Chander Kashyap <chander.kash...@linaro.org> wrote: > SMDK5250 board is based on Samsungs EXYNOS5250 SoC. > > Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap <chander.kash...@linaro.org> > --- > MAINTAINERS | 1 + > arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c | 24 +- > arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/clock.h | 232 +-------- > arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/clock_exynos4.h | 255 +++++++++ > arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/clock_exynos5.h | 352 +++++++++++++ > arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/cpu.h | 71 ++-- > arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/cpu_exynos4.h | 51 ++ > arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/cpu_exynos5.h | 39 ++ > arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/gpio.h | 51 ++- > board/samsung/smdk5250/Makefile | 48 ++ > board/samsung/smdk5250/lowlevel_init.S | 524 +++++++++++++++++++ > board/samsung/smdk5250/mem_setup.S | 600 > ++++++++++++++++++++++ > board/samsung/smdk5250/smdk5250.c | 125 +++++ > board/samsung/smdk5250/smdk5250_setup.h | 583 +++++++++++++++++++++ > boards.cfg | 1 + > include/configs/smdk5250.h | 182 +++++++ > 16 files changed, 2867 insertions(+), 272 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/clock_exynos4.h > create mode 100644 arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/clock_exynos5.h > create mode 100644 arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/cpu_exynos4.h > create mode 100644 arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/cpu_exynos5.h > create mode 100644 board/samsung/smdk5250/Makefile > create mode 100644 board/samsung/smdk5250/lowlevel_init.S > create mode 100644 board/samsung/smdk5250/mem_setup.S > create mode 100644 board/samsung/smdk5250/smdk5250.c > create mode 100644 board/samsung/smdk5250/smdk5250_setup.h > create mode 100644 include/configs/smdk5250.h
Please split this patch for board and SoC. > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > index a56ca10..abf88be 100644 > --- a/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > @@ -704,6 +704,7 @@ Chander Kashyap <k.chan...@samsung.com> > > origen ARM ARMV7 (EXYNOS4210 SoC) > SMDKV310 ARM ARMV7 (EXYNOS4210 SoC) > + SMDK5250 ARM ARMV7 (EXYNOS5250 SoC) > > Torsten Koschorrek <koschor...@synertronixx.de> > scb9328 ARM920T (i.MXL) > diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c > b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c > index b101f96..88e2fc0 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c > +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c > @@ -125,10 +125,14 @@ static unsigned long exynos_get_pwm_clk(void) > > if (s5p_get_cpu_rev() == 0) { > /* > - * CLK_SRC_PERIL0 > + * CLK_SRC_{PERIL0 | PERIC0} > * PWM_SEL [27:24] > */ > +#ifdef CONFIG_EXYNOS5 > + sel = readl(&clk->src_peric0); > +#else > sel = readl(&clk->src_peril0); > +#endif NAK. We don't allow to using ifdef for separating SoCs. Please refer s5pc1xx case for solve it. This comment apply to this patch globally. Please remove '#ifdef CONFIG_EXYNOS5'. Thanks. Minkyu Kang. -- from. prom. www.promsoft.net _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot