On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Scott Wood <scottw...@freescale.com> wrote: > On 12/13/2011 12:04 PM, Tom Rini wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Stefano Babic <sba...@denx.de> wrote: >>> Currently nand_spl_simple puts it's temp data at 0x10000 offset in SDRAM >>> which is likely to contain already loaded data. >>> The patch saves the oob data and the ecc on the stack replacing >>> the fixed address in RAM. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic <sba...@denx.de> >>> CC: Ilya Yanok <ya...@emcraft.com> >>> CC: Scott Wood <scottw...@freescale.com> >>> CC: Tom Rini <tom.r...@gmail.com> >>> CC: Simon Schwarz <simonschwarz...@googlemail.com> >>> CC: Wolfgang Denk <w...@denx.de> >> >> Acked-by: Tom Rini <tr...@ti.com> >> >> Which covers the omap config file changes. Assuming Wolfgang doesn't >> see a problem with using SYS_... in defines, Scott, do you want this >> via your tree (in /next) since it's NAND or in mine since it's TI >> boards? Assuming you don't see any problems of course. Thanks! > > The board-specific stuff is just removing unneeded NAND config items, > and isn't depending on other non-NAND patches, so I can take it through > my tree -- but if you want me to ACK it (once the minor issues are > fixed) to go via your tree so you can build on top of it sooner, that's > fine...
Just building up my /next tree and don't want this to get lost, so if you can take v4 once it's out and you're happy, I'd appreciate it. Thanks! -- Tom _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
