On 07/12/2011 18:57, Simon Schwarz wrote: >> >> So if the parse function fails, we should have the fallback to u-boot, >> exactly as we have now the fallback from u-boot.img to u-boot.bin. >> > Hm, I don't think that we want any fallback here. I would prefere an > error message and hang. The direct boot is designed to be used in the > field - so IMHO we don't want to start the bootloader automatically if a > normal startup fails.
this is also reasonable - we should drop the current behavior: if Linux is not found, SPL tries to start the loaded code as u-boot.bin. Better to hang with a message. >> The function you write are in omap-common/spl_nand.c, but they are not >> specific for OMAP, and any architecture can profit from your work. What >> about to move common functions away from TI related directory ? I do not >> know which is the best place, maybe a new directory under the root as >> spllib ? > Hm thats generally right. I would prefer lib_spl. Somehow it feels like > going back to nand_spl times. Duno if there are better places? Tom probably can suggest us something.. BR, Stefano Babic -- ===================================================================== DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: off...@denx.de ===================================================================== _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
