Dear Igor Grinberg, In message <4ecde8c3.2050...@compulab.co.il> you wrote: > > > By that logic _all_ commits in the Linux kernel must have the SoB of > > Linus Torvalds. Do they? > > No they should not. > As for my understanding, the delivery path ends with the repository > from which the pull process starts.
That makes no sense either. What about the case where the author provides (say, for convenience) a git repository where we can pull from, instead of applying the posting from the ML or PW? > That is, the repository that has the *commit id* first set > and then it is not changed, because pull requests keep the > history intact. This is the reason, why Linus Torvalds do not > sign each patch pulled from others with git pull. Hm... what's the difference then between pulling from a tree or cherry picking from it? What about rebasing a tree? Sorry, but all this makes not much sense to me. No matter how you handle it, it seems a pretty arbitrary decision to me. And in all these cases the code is not touched any more. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de Experience is what causes a person to make new mistakes instead of old ones. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
