Dear Stefano Babic, In message <4ecd25ea.1020...@denx.de> you wrote: > > >> | (c) The contribution was provided directly to me by some other > >> | person who certified (a), (b) or (c) and I have not modified > >> | it. ... > >> (a) and (b) don't apply here, and (d) is not relevant in this context. > >> So the question is if (c) applies, or not. > > > > Well, I think yes (c) applies here and if you look into the Linux > > git log, you will see that all patches applied by maintainers are > > also signed by them. > > Reading (c), I can interprete as Igor does...
I _can_ interpret that so as well, but does it make sense? By that logic _all_ commits in the Linux kernel must have the SoB of Linus Torvalds. Do they? Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de : I've tried (in vi) "g/[a-z]\n[a-z]/s//_/"...but that doesn't : cut it. Any ideas? (I take it that it may be a two-pass sort of solution). In the first pass, install perl. :-) Larry Wall <6...@jpl-devvax.jpl.nasa.gov> _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot