On Monday 21 November 2011 23:46:41 Marek Vasut wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 11:50:17PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: > > > > + l.addi r3,r3,4 > > > > + l.sfltu r4,r5 > > > > + l.bf .L_reloc > > > > + l.addi r4,r4,4 /* delay slot */ > > > > > > The formating here doesn't seem right? > > > > The extra space there is to denote that the instruction is > > in a delay slot. > > I think it brings more readability to the code, but if it > > meets too much resistance I'll remove them. > > You already have comment there, but let's see what the others think.
i think it's fine. delay slots are a pita enough to deal with, so slight style tweaks that make this easier are a good thing. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
