> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 11:53:32PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > +int do_bdinfo(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag, int argc, char * const
> > > argv[]) +{
> > > + bd_t *bd = gd->bd;
> > > +
> > > + print_num("mem start", (ulong)bd->bi_memstart);
> > > + print_lnum("mem size", (u64)bd->bi_memsize);
> > > + print_num("flash start", (ulong)bd->bi_flashstart);
> > > + print_num("flash size", (ulong)bd->bi_flashsize);
> > > + print_num("flash offset", (ulong)bd->bi_flashoffset);
> > > +
> > > +#if defined(CONFIG_CMD_NET)
> > > + print_eth(0);
> > > + printf("ip_addr = %pI4\n", &bd->bi_ip_addr);
> > > +#endif
> > > +
> > > + printf("baudrate = %ld bps\n", bd->bi_baudrate);
> >
> > Would consistent format of the printed data be a problem ? ;-)
>
> I'm sorry, I don't think I understand what you are referring to here.
> When printed, they are all lined up.
> If I haven't missed something, every arch does the printing like that.
Ok, then that's good.
>
> Stefan
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
