On 11/14/2011 11:55 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
> On 11/14/2011 10:06 AM, Helmut Raiger wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
> Hi Helmut,
>
>> Stefano I don't want to be pushing, but this sits here since 3
>> weeks, can I be of some help?
> in my answer I post the question about the fact there is no use case for
> this code until you will submit also the patch for your board adding
> MMC. So please resubmit both as patchset, else this single patch is as
> dead code, and this is not accepted in u-boot, even if it is a
> preparation for further patches - we cannot know if and then the follow
> up patches will be sent.
>
>> Concerning the TT-01 extension patch, I meant it has to wait until this
>> patch is through.
> No, we do not add code that is never compiled. And it is easier to see
> some problem in review if it is shown as the code is used.
>
>> So if you don't like the idea of having a patch no-one is using,
> Yes, I do not like it.
>
>> simply
>> apply both of them.
>> For your reference:
>>
>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/122139/ this one
>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/122176/ board support
>> extension
> Does it mean the last patch is ready for review ? Then I will go on with
> both.
>
> Best regards,
> Stefano Babic
>
Hi Stefan,
I will check the proposition you made for the board support
extension (which
removes the awkward HALE logo from the u-boot source tree, which didn't
feel quite right
when I was adding it.)
So you may ignore these for now and I will send a patch set that
contains both patches
with your suggested changes.
Thanx, Helmut
--
Scanned by MailScanner.
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
