Hi Gabe, On 12/11/11 17:19, Gabe Black wrote: > On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Mike Frysinger <vap...@gentoo.org > <mailto:vap...@gentoo.org>> wrote: > > On Wednesday 09 November 2011 14:12:15 Scott Wood wrote: > > Last I tried, I couldn't get it to work even with USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC, > > because the compiler was generating calls to things that U-Boot didn't > > implement. > > last i tried, i saw failures only for boards using yaffs as apparently > that > code triggered some extended math operations that the local libgcc > omits. i > didn't look further to see if it was a matter of the yaffs code being > wrong > (i.e. trying to do a 64bit divide rather than using do_div), or libgcc > should > include that logic. i don't use yaffs, so meh :). > -mike > > _______________________________________________ > U-Boot mailing list > U-Boot@lists.denx.de <mailto:U-Boot@lists.denx.de> > http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot > > > I'm sure folks realize this, but I thought I would point out that we're > actually primarily talking about a different patch. To me it sounded like > this one, importing glibc's memset, was good to go, and I wouldn't want it > to be held up by the controversy around the other patch, how to deal with > libgcc. If there's anything more to say about memset lets say it here, and > if there's more to say about libgcc (I have a feeling there is) lets please > move that over to the other thread.
I have no issue with this patch - It will look to apply shortly Regards, Graeme _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
