> On Thursday 10 November 2011 11:58:17 Marek Vasut wrote: > > > On Wednesday 09 November 2011 04:18:13 Marek Vasut wrote: > > > > +int gpio_request(int gp, const char *label) > > > > > > all of these gpio funcs should be "unsigned gpio" > > > > It's a problem of API then? > > > > include/asm/gpio.h:int gpio_request(int gp, const char *label); > > a patch has been posted already to fix that
Posted, yes ... applied? > > > TBH, I can't imagine gpio number to be lower than zero, but who knows. > > such a value makes no sense. the incoming number is interpreted by the > gpio driver, so the starting/ending numbers are completely arbitrary. > thus we deal with unsigned only. > -mike Definitelly. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot