Good morning Heiko,
On Monday, October 24, 2011, Heiko Schocher <h...@denx.de> wrote:
[...]
>
> arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/dm365_lowlevel.c | 466
++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm/include/asm/arch-davinci/dm365_lowlevel.h | 43 ++
> 2 files changed, 509 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/dm365_lowlevel.c
> create mode 100644 arch/arm/include/asm/arch-davinci/dm365_lowlevel.h
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/dm365_lowlevel.c
b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/dm365_lowlevel.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..d7c6a3e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/
[...]
> +void dm365_lpc_transition(unsigned char module, unsigned char domain,
> + unsigned char state)
> +{
[...]
> + dm365_lpc_transition(LPSC_DDR2, 0, PSC_ENABLE);
[...]
> + /* Set the DDR2 to synreset, then enable it again */
> + dm365_lpc_transition(LPSC_DDR2, 0, PSC_SYNCRESET);
> + dm365_lpc_transition(LPSC_DDR2, 0, PSC_ENABLE);
> +
dm365.c from the same directory uses lpsc_on(). Could you also use this
function (and lpsc_syncreset from [1]) and remove dm365_lpc_transition
instead?
Regards, Christian
[1] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/119375/
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
