Wolfgang, On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 09:58:44PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Jason, > > In message <20111014131245.gf7...@titan.lakedaemon.net> you wrote: > > > > 1.) checkpatch.pl complained about volatile in source.c:312. This is > > a register we bitbang in a loop and we don't want the compiler > > optimizing it out. > > This would, in almost all cases, trigger a NAK due to the fact that > device register accesses should be done through I/O accesors, and > never through volatile pointers.
very true, I was attempting to give a generic example. Sorry if that led to any confusion. thx, Jason. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot