On Sunday, October 09, 2011 11:01:36 AM Remy Bohmer wrote: > Hi Marek, > > >> > > it's hard to evaluate each piece by itself when it's just one patch > >> > > smooshing it all together > >> > > >> > Well how would you rework crap code piece by piece? > >> > >> - fix style > >> - abstract out stuff > > > > Not like there was so much abstraction it couldn't be squashed into this > > one. > > > >> - add new generic key support > > > > True, this could be separated out. Well, Remy ... what do you think? > > A patch that fixes style issues should _only_ fix style issues. It > should not contain any functional change. This makes it all easier to > review. Not only for me, but for everyone else as well.
That I understand, but I started the rework with properly passing the keyboard data in mind. That got me to a point where I had to change most of the code, including fixing some of the usb host drivers (because they used that extern new;). And from that point, it was pointless to try keeping it separate. btw Mike, I was wrong, the generic key support can't be separated out, it must be there because you can't access the extern new anymore. Cheers > > Kind regards, > > Remy _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot