Dear Stephen Warren, In message <74cdbe0f657a3d45afbb94109fb122ff173a2c7...@hqmail01.nvidia.com> you wrote: > > > I suggest we define a new image type (say, IH_TYPE_KERNEL_REL) for > > this purpose. This would probably cause the least conflicts. > > OK. Wouldn't we also need e.g. IH_TYPE_STANDALONE_REL, IH_TYPE_RAMDISK_REL > and perhaps other too?
I don't think so - either these don't have (and use) load and entry point addesses (like in the ramdisk case), or they are not easily relocatable in the same way as the Linux kernel. No, at the moment only the Linux kernel images need to support tis property. OK, eventually this might be useful for multi-part images, too, but these have been deprecated for a long time, and here the user should just use a FIT image instead, Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de "How is this place run - is it an anarchy?" "No, I wouldn't say so; it is not that well organised..." _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
