Dear Stephen Warren,

In message <74cdbe0f657a3d45afbb94109fb122ff173a2c7...@hqmail01.nvidia.com> you 
wrote:
>
> Wolfgang, does this change look like a reasonable approach?

Yes, looks good to me - with the nitpick of a bit more explicit
comment.  See previous message.

> What are your thoughts on the legacy format; should we ignore it? We
> could probably steal some bit in one of the fields for this flag, although
> technically that would be a change to the format, with potential
> compatibility issues.

I would really like to see this supported as well - so far only a
minority of users use FIT images.

I suggest we define a new image type (say, IH_TYPE_KERNEL_REL) for
this purpose.  This would probably cause the least conflicts.

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de
"I find this a nice feature but it is not according to  the  documen-
tation. Or is it a BUG?"   "Let's call it an accidental feature. :-)"
                       - Larry Wall in <6...@jpl-devvax.jpl.nasa.gov>
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to