Dear Stephen Warren, In message <74cdbe0f657a3d45afbb94109fb122ff173a2c7...@hqmail01.nvidia.com> you wrote: > > Wolfgang, does this change look like a reasonable approach?
Yes, looks good to me - with the nitpick of a bit more explicit comment. See previous message. > What are your thoughts on the legacy format; should we ignore it? We > could probably steal some bit in one of the fields for this flag, although > technically that would be a change to the format, with potential > compatibility issues. I would really like to see this supported as well - so far only a minority of users use FIT images. I suggest we define a new image type (say, IH_TYPE_KERNEL_REL) for this purpose. This would probably cause the least conflicts. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de "I find this a nice feature but it is not according to the documen- tation. Or is it a BUG?" "Let's call it an accidental feature. :-)" - Larry Wall in <6...@jpl-devvax.jpl.nasa.gov> _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot