Le 19/09/2011 16:21, Paulraj, Sandeep a écrit : > > >> >> Hi Wofgang, >> >> Le 19/09/2011 09:47, Wolfgang Denk a écrit : >>> Dear Albert ARIBAUD, >>> >>> In message<4e76ebfd.9060...@aribaud.net> you wrote: >>>> >>>> As this is your 'next' branch, there is an ambiguity: can you please >>>> indicate if you want me to pull this into my 'next' or 'master' branch? >>>> >>>> If on master, I assume you want me to also send out a pull request to >>>> Wolfgang, but I am not sure Wolfgang will allow it at this time. >>> >>> If I understand correctly this is mostly fixes, so I'd take it. >> >> Sandeep's 'next' branch is based on my 'next', not on my 'master', hence >> my question -- there would have to be a rebase if Sandeep expected me to >> pull into my master. >> >> Sandeep, can you confirm what you want exactly? Meanwhile, I am >> launching regression builds on u-boot-ti/next, just in case. >> > Albert, > > The pull request if for your next branch.
Thanks a lot. There is a regression in u-boot-ti/next with respect to u-boot-arm/next, on board smdk6400, causing the following build failure: s3c64xx.c:80: error: static declaration of 'nand_read_buf' follows non-static declaration /home/uboot/src/u-boot-arm/include/nand.h:139: error: previous declaration of 'nand_read_buf' was here Git bisect finds commit 55f429bb39614a16b1bacc9a8bea9ac01a60bfc8 is the cause of the regression. Copying Simon as the author of the commit, in order to confirm that the issue is in smdk6400. If so, as MAINTAINERS has smdk marked orphaned and its former maintainer resigned, I take the ti/next branch in as it is, and if no one steps in as a maintainer for SMDK6400 before end of the 2011-12 releaése merge window, I will then apply a board removal patch for it. > Thanks, > Sandeep Amicalement, -- Albert. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
