Kumar Gala wrote: > 1. We reduce the amount printed in the "default" case > 2. First choice should always be to have a command the print status info > 3. Allow a board port to makes its own decision if it wants to do something > like enable CONFIG_PCI_SCAN_SHOW > > Any concerns w/that proposal?
Are you talking about my patch, or about CONFIG_PCI_SCAN_SHOW? The reason I like my patch as-is is because it completely eliminates the board from the decision. It's only one line, and it's CONSISTENT. That's the key part. We have not been consistent about this, and it seems silly for each board to implement the same feature. -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
