Wolfgang, On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 23:30 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear York Sun, > > In message <1314307500.29220.24.camel@oslab-l1> you wrote: > > > > Fixing all existing reference to ccs_ddr is a lot of work, comparing > > with defining it for 83xx. There are many other typedefs in the very > > same files. Would we fix all of them? I don't think so. The bottom of > > well, if you could fix all of these while you are at it that would be > just great :-)
There are nearly 400 typedefs for powerpc and 52 for immap_85xx.h, not mentioned when they are used by .c files. Too many to fix. > > > line is ccsr_ddr is not a new typedef. > > But you are adding it new to this file. I am introducing it to this file as it is already being used somewhere else. If you are trying to enforce this new policy, please start with brand new files/typedefs, as you pointed out in my another patch. I will be happy to fix that. York _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
