On Thursday, August 25, 2011 01:04:17 AM Eric Jarrige wrote: > Dear Wolfgang, > > On 24 août 2011, at 22:20, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > Dear Eric Jarrige, > > > > In message <[email protected]> you wrote: > >>>> I'am just wondering: I see that DM9000_DBG is used all over dm9000 > >>>> code - do you know the reason why not just use debug()? > >> > >> dm9000 does not use debug() at all. > >> That's the reason to fix the printf issues as a first priority by using > >> the DM9000_DBG. > > > > NAK. > > > > If you touch that, then please do it right: us debug() instead, and > > remove DM9000_DBG. Thanks. > > Do you mean both changes in one patch?
My wild guess would be to FIRST fix the DM9000_DBG and NEXT convert these printf()s to debug()s. Cheers > > Best regards, > Eric > _______________________________________________ > U-Boot mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
