On Wednesday, August 10, 2011 03:45:11 AM Hong Xu wrote:
> Hi Marek Vasut,
>
> On 08/10/2011 03:55 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Tuesday, August 09, 2011 03:57:41 AM Hong Xu wrote:
> >> Hi Marek Vasut,
>
> >> On 08/09/2011 01:34 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> [...]
>
> >>>> printf("WARNING: %s - start address %x is not aligned\n"
> >>>>
> >>>> __FUNCTION__, start);
> >>>
> >>> __func__ is prefered in linux kernel :-)
> >>
> >> __func__ is C99 standard. __FUNCTION__ appears more in U-Boot. ;-)
> >
> > This doesn't mean it's correct ;-) "majority proof" isn't a proof really.
> >
> >> GCC manual says some older GCC only recognize __FUNCTION__ .
> >> If we rely on GCC, it looks __FUNCTION__ will reduce troubles.
> >
> > Do we support such ancient versions of GCC anyway ? Just to be clear, I'm
> > fine with either way, just my 2.7183 cents ;-)
>
> Agree. Just after last reply, I reconsidered the situation in the
> tearoom. __func__ looks better. ;-) I'll resend the patch soon, thanks.
Thanks, I'm very much looking forward to this patch in mainline.
>
> BR,
> Eric
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
