Hi Marek Vasut,
On 08/10/2011 03:55 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 09, 2011 03:57:41 AM Hong Xu wrote:
>> Hi Marek Vasut,
>>
>> On 08/09/2011 01:34 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
[...]
>>>> printf("WARNING: %s - start address %x is not aligned\n"
>>>>
>>>> __FUNCTION__, start);
>>>
>>> __func__ is prefered in linux kernel :-)
>>
>> __func__ is C99 standard. __FUNCTION__ appears more in U-Boot. ;-)
>
> This doesn't mean it's correct ;-) "majority proof" isn't a proof really.
>
>> GCC manual says some older GCC only recognize __FUNCTION__ .
>> If we rely on GCC, it looks __FUNCTION__ will reduce troubles.
>
> Do we support such ancient versions of GCC anyway ? Just to be clear, I'm fine
> with either way, just my 2.7183 cents ;-)
Agree. Just after last reply, I reconsidered the situation in the
tearoom. __func__ looks better. ;-) I'll resend the patch soon, thanks.
BR,
Eric
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
