> -----Original Message----- > From: Jason [mailto:u-b...@lakedaemon.net] > Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 7:38 AM > To: Prafulla Wadaskar > Cc: cl...@debian.org; w...@denx.de; u-boot@lists.denx.de; Prabhanjan > Sarnaik; Ashish Karkare; Siddarth Gore; bd...@gag.com > Subject: Re: RFC [PATCH 5/5 v5] dreamplug: use MACH_TYPE_DREAMPLUG > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:40:27AM -0700, Prafulla Wadaskar wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Jason Cooper [mailto:u-b...@lakedaemon.net] > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 2:49 AM > > > To: cl...@debian.org; w...@denx.de; Prafulla Wadaskar > > > Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Prabhanjan Sarnaik; Ashish Karkare; > Siddarth > > > Gore; bd...@gag.com; Jason Cooper > > > Subject: RFC [PATCH 5/5 v5] dreamplug: use MACH_TYPE_DREAMPLUG > > > > Sorry about my related comments in patch 4/5, you can merge this patch > > to 4/5 to avoid confusion. > > See my comments in my reply to 4/5. I'd like (if possible) to get this > merged before h*ll freezes over (Linux arm tree cleaned up). So, I'm > trying to break the patch up into logical migration pieces. > > Since every Dreamplug on the market sets and uses MACH_TYPE_GURUPLUG, I > think it's reasonable to use it (hopefully merged into u-boot) until the > linux-arm tree gets sorted out and they accept new boards / machids. > Then, the last patch can be added. > > Am I way off base with that idea?
So this is gating to provide dreamplug as separate board support or anther version for guruplug. Regards.. Prafulla . . _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
