On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 09:51:01 +0200 Simon Schwarz <simonschwarz...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 07/27/2011 11:38 PM, Scott Wood wrote: > > Note that there will not be one implementation of nand_copy_image suitable > > for all hardware, just as currently nand_spl/nand_boot.c is not used for > > all NAND SPL targets. > > Hm. I know that. I just adapated the old nand_boot.c. While we're moving things around, could we call it something like "nand_spl_simple.c"? > AFAIK the other implementations use prefixes for the function names - > therefore we can just add them to the nand-spl-library and gcc will do > the rest. The other implementations do not have prefixes -- they all are entered via nand_boot(). More importantly, not all implementations are buildable for all targets. They depend on certain #defines that may not be there. This includes the "simple" implementation. -Scott _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
